Refutations 1

Date: 2/5/2021

2.5.5.21 i will add to these refutations as they occur in my mind to be written down. the numbers arent in chronological order. 1 It has become my realization, through inference, that god created woman, and she was bored, and thus god created man through her womb. i surmised this based on the premise that while the pollen of man dies if not resident inside the womb of woman, it is the seed of woman that propagates man. thus woman was ordained by god to issue forth her people onto the realms. if woman did not exist before man, then how could man be born? the same works for all life forms. it has come to my realization thus, that god is in fact a beautiful young woman. god created man in her image, and when she was born, god created drone as a joy of man. thus woman is closer to the realization of gods form than a drone. there is no real reason known to us why any kind of man, god, or universe exists. the man of earth, and the drones of man do become corrupt as the gods do, but realizations occur, and the corruptions recede. why would god, having created the universe, as so said, barge around her creation looking like an old man nearing death? god is very careful about her appearance, and would not like to be insulted by such notions. incidentally, depictions of god that it likes can be seen by god, and those people shall be praised. 2 for this reason, i have come to believe that mary is slightly stronger and smarter than the lord jesus. if it was mary who had to do the work that jesus did, those things would probably have happened to mary, and she would have been killed in various horrific ways. thus, marys treatment of mankind upon this earth would still have been different slightly. according to the account, jesus was accused to heresay and sentenced to death by public cruxifiction. after he died, he went to hell, where he activated some sort of wall of fire, then he returned after three days, and demonstrated a kind of strength that he never did when he was alive, by moving an enormous boulder that was certainly heavier than 1 ton by himself. why if jesus was a ghost did he need to move the boulder? why if jesus was much stronger as a ghost was he incarnated. mary, who was also accused, but not arrested, for some reason, was allegedly reading scrolls to children when an unidentified flying object appeared, abducted her into the sky, and then disappeared. 300 years later, starships supposedly from the mother mary federation were seen over rome by romans. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vision_of_the_Cross#:~:text=The%20Vision%20of%20the%20Cross%20is%20located%20in,as%20seen%20in%20the%20fresco%20and%20following%20Eusebius soon after that, the roman emperor constantine renounces zeus and the other gods in favor of mary. this is not the last account of these sightings in our history. apparantly, mary is running some sort of charitable federation in space. it has not been evident what else she does. 3 there is no proof that god created this universe. there is no way to prove that god intended this universe. there is no way to prove that there arent other gods or universes. i would rather believe in the fantastic and possible, than in the unprovable things. such statements fall out of the realms of science and even logic. such statements are based not even in logic. science is not a matter of sentiment in terms of what is to be believed, or even how to believe. it is based in logic, and logic pervades any universe. 4 for this reason, it has come to my attention, that the people who originally wrote the ancient jewish myths that preceded the bible, had what they had written to be believed absolutely. they had reached such a height of power, that any questioning of them was suppressed in violent, horrific, and unnecessary ways, even when the questioning was meant only to verify if these accounts were actually true. verification was not a well enough understood concept at the time. therefore, the metaphoric proxy, put up by jesus, in context, needs to be science based, so that the people can continue to logically maintain a certain consistency with the universe. so why is it not science based? this must be true for the reason that we are homonids of humanoid structure, and therefor capable in our own capacity to go into space and communicate with other space people. imagine the embarrassment that would occur, if these being took their instruments, measured the ages of the structures like stars and rocks in their own way, and heard what we would tell them, about the universe or earth being what was claimed in the time before verification. we would become a dangerous laughing stock. we would become the people that mary took pity on. we would be flying through space in our sedans. 5 as an example, here are ten refutations to common fundamental questions about the universe. citation: https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/the-10-best-evidences-from-science-that-confirm-a-young-earth/ #1 very little sediment on the seafloor refers to the seafloor, which is the surface of a set of layers. the sediment is compacted under the seafloor. #2 Bent rock layers sometimes, the earth moves side to side, not just up and down. see: earthquakes. #3 Soft tissue in fossils living tissue becomes hard when it dies, in will stay hard until it is wet, even if it is in a millions year old fossil. #4 The faint sun paradox The center, or core, of our sun, is mostly iron, actually. it is surrounded with a corona of fusion that is likely to expand and thin as the sun ages. once the corona of fusion is thin enough, it collapses, and the sun begins to die. citation: http://jtgnew.sjrdesign.net/solsys_sun.html as the sun rotation, heavier particles, like helium, are ejected more rapidly that hydrogen from the center, thus the concentration of fissile hydrogen is preserved. fission reactions may also take place in the corona of fusion, thus the amount of hydrogen available for fusion is stabilized. during the ancient periods like the cretaceous and denisovian periods, there was actually much more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. So there is a possibility that the sun was cooler back then, or earth was in a different orbit around the sun. #5 Rapidly decaying magnetic field i actually dont have an obvious possibility for this one. the core either magnetizes in cycles, or by other means that cannot be either observed or explained. #6 Helium in radioactive rocks when atoms decay, one form of decay is actually called beta decay, where the atom releases a beta particle. this beta particle is also called helium. #7 Carbon 14 in fossils, coal, and diamonds many isotopes of boron, nitrogen and others will decay into carbon 14. #8 Short lived comets when a comet reaches a distance away from the sun, it may attract ice particles from those regions, and grow. #9 Very little salt in the sea you forgot about the salt in basins under the sea, in land, and in mountains, see salt lake city. #10 the dna in ancient bacteria it will remain for as long as it is solid, even if is is for millions of years. see refutation #3. #11 the earth is flat a in ancient times, an man called Eratosthenes actually measures the shadow angle of one well, travelled many miles to another well, waited until it was the same time he measured the first well, then measured the shadow of the second well. the angle of the shadows were different by so much so that he actually calculated the radius of the earth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes b there is actually also a biblical refutation for this. when solomon was a king, a young boy asked him why only the lookout was visible when a ship was far enough out to see. his advisors reasoned that if the earth really was flat, then the whole ship would just seem small since it is fat away. so any person who ever saw a ship sail out to see would know that the earth is round. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9223423/Moon-appears-DEFLATE-disappears-horizon-ISS-footage.html https://mysticsciences.com/2016/09/29/fata-morgana-a-superior-mirage/ https://www.quora.com/Why-can-I-see-things-over-the-horizon-with-a-telescope 6 as another likely example, lets take the logical step of parametric inversion, and ask the question of what if jesus never happened? imagine the whole of creation, as created by god, but jesus never happened. as the romans move west to scandanavia, and into the americas, cathedrals pop up all over the western hemisphere. but while the jews believe in yahweh, and the celts believe in odin, and the romans believe in zeus, and the mayans believe in xopatchliti, and the scientists believe in galileo, the various monuments would be to all these gods, and their associated demigods, and historical figures, would each have their own devoted following. imagine the chaos, if people believed in all these gods just as people did about jesus. there would be wars over different brands of butter, or flavors of confections. why is it that when science appears here, it is perceived to be different, and wrong to these people? do the people on this planet not have the authority to make the claims evidenced from modern science? there had been many powerful visitations from powerful visitors in the past. in similarity, osiris was brutalized by his jealous brother, and he became the lord of death in hell. after he died, this empire had fantastic technology, and lasted 10000 years. there are many other instances of great empires and fantastic feats that occurred by and were witnessed by other people throughout the world, and their empires also lasted many thousands of years. one should not believe that such people would not appear at any time. when they appear, none of them should be associated with the creation of the universe. there are too many of them, and there is no way to prove that. they are just other travelers from their companies that are elsewhere. https://m0vie.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/voy-coldfire26.jpg also, we should ask them to be kind and respectful to the earth. because it is literally just a tiny mold that spins around its homestar. it is not to be compared to the planets or stars that can move through space by themselves. 7 what is also evident in our history, but nowhere to be found in the bible, are the works of newton and einstein. isaac newton was also raised christian. so much so, that there could be no distinction between the works of the bible, and the motions of the universe. at one point, he sees an apple fall from the tree, and looks up at the moon. then he realizes, though intelligent reasoning, that the moon is a solid object, and is gravitationally bound to the earth. the theory of gravitation was later published. the theory of gravitation, which is not directly mentioned in the bible, is indirectly refuted by the bible, when the entire universe expanded to cross its vast distances in only 7 days. some years later, albert einstein, who was raised jewish, so much so, that there could be no distinction between culture, and education. at one point, he imagines two trains passing by, and that he is somehow on both of the trains at the same time. he reasons that if they were moving at different velocities, then they would seem to be moving at yet different velocities to each other. thus, the theory of relativity would go on to predict the speed of light. relativity is not mentioned anywhere in the bible, yet, the bible indirectly refutes relativity, when the light that should take many millions of years to reach us by the distant stars, reaches us in only 7 days. even if it were possible for physical matter to move that quickly, the light would fade from these objects as they speed away from us. if newton can be proven right, and einstein can be proven right, but the universe expanding to its current size in 7 days still cannot be proven, then what is going on here? a conspiracy? we should not refer back to before the age of verification without the ability to prove claims from that era. people who believe things before they are proven should be asked to proved these things, or risk seeming ridiculous. einstein never did anything to identify himself as a jew his whole adulthood. 8 i used to play a game called sim theme park. in the game, i could go into the park area, and see everything from anyone elses point of view, and i would seem like a normal visitor to others. but i could also go back to my dashboard, and pull out an item from my itinerary. when did that, some money is spent, and engineers go to work building exactly what i put there. i used to play a game called bridge commander. when my vessel entered a region of space, the stars would render. i would rotate my vessel, and see the star, but i could also see the other stars in the distance. when i move my vessel to another star, the stars would render, but the distances would be proportional to the distance between the system where i am and the system where i just was. there was no way that i could possibly reach those other stars in the game. there was also no way that i could measure their distance away from my vessel. so maybe, like any other game, it is not possible for this game to be completely accurate. it would have its parameters like any other game. 9 http://www.honeybeecentre.com/PagePictures/Services/WaspNestGallery/honeybee-swarm-800.jpg https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/databank_piratesaucermothership_01_169_0c4866d0.jpeg?region=0%2C49%2C1560%2C780 http://archive.videogamesdaily.com/media/rc2_review/01c.jpg are all possible, but youre not going to get very far through space by just killing everything that doesnt suit your idea of perfection. 10 to this day, the only religions that refer to actual methodologies are the sciences, with the exclusion of finance, because although it is enforceable as a mental system, it is not physically possible to actually do those things. finance does not qualify to be a science. i was wondering why when the hebrews and the muslims and the hindus practice their works, the things that are depicted in these works dont happen. scientific texts are exclusively replicable things that mention the exact components and methods needed and the people who first did those exact things. why do these religious texts not contain physically applicable methodologies? rather than praying to gods which doesnt work, there is no methodology printed for how it physically works, we should be holding the inventions in our mind, and consider why these are possible, by actually replicating them in functional ways. i find it to be very subversive when leaders see that these religions dont work, but they state sanction these activities anyway. it is your leaders that direct the major things that happen, not the gods. 11 the notion of gods flies out of the window when you compare a bunch of cavemen to a space fleet. they will obviously be doing many many things that dont make sense to the caveman, but they are the standard way of living for a space being. if a being is born in space and has immediate access to certain facilities, then they will be living their lives in certain ways. 12 i was wondering why we were created. are we earth people, doomed to remain resident to a moss ball that just spins around a tiny red star in an eternal orbit? our bodies dont have many of the facilities that space counterparts would have if they existed. so what were we created to do?